Conclusions

Good quality digital images of brain sections are produced in different ways, depending on the size of the field to be imaged:

  1. For sections or fields over 25 mm in length or width, use direct scanning of the tissue in a good quality desktop scanner (e.g. the LaCie Silverscanner II), using the Transparency mode.
  2. For sections that are less than 15 mm in length or width, a microscope is used with either a film camera (to make 35 mm slides for subsequent scanning) or a digital camera (in our tests, the Kodak DCS 200 or the Leaf Lumina Scanning Camera)
  3. For sections between 15 mm and 25 mm, optimal results are obtained using a camera (film or digital), a good series of "macro" lenses (Leitz Summar or their equivalents by Nikon, 24-80 mm), and an appropriate slide holder and illuminator.
Images obtained from the desktop scanner or the digital camera had two advantages over those captured from film and subsequently scanned:
  1. Much less editing is needed to produce good final results, and
  2. The electronic images were immediately available, thereby avoiding the time-consuming processes of film development and subsequent scanning.
For brain sections, computer image files of 150 pixels per inch, with a maximum dimension of 1050 pixels (stored as PICT files, compressed by the "high-quality" level of JPEG compression included in the PICT file creation module of the Adobe Photoshop program), provide good economical electronic storage and transmission, for on-screen viewing, and for making good quality prints.
All images on this site are copyrighted and produced with the support of public funds.
Click here to learn how to use them for free